Relatives' Heartache Over Shoreline Erosion Threatening Coastal Norfolk Graves
Families whose relatives laid to rest in resting places at risk from shoreline retreat argue that a lack of decision over how to address the issue is creating unnecessary distress about the eternal homes of their departed family.
A Looming Threat to Ancient Graveyards
Local authorities have singled out three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being swallowed by the sea in the coming decades.
A recent report on the situation details a series of possible actions, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and relocating them in more secure locations. Officials maintain it is for local people to decide how to move forward.
“At the moment we’re in limbo. It upsets me. My parents intended this to serve as their final resting place, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”
Projections indicate at least a portion of one churchyard could fall into the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen much sooner. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.
Haunted by the Ghosts of Eccles
A local business owner remembered a school trip to the nearby village of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the sea, along with its church and graveyard.
“You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get carried away to sea. They won’t. People will take bones as mementos and go plundering graves looking for treasures. That is completely undignified.”
“I’m worried that the same thing that befell at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I’d be appalled by that.”
A Paratrooper's Grave in Peril
Along the shoreline is situated the grave of a former paratrooper killed while serving overseas. His mother expressed she lost sleep after learning her child's final plot might one day be moved.
“It truly trouble me to consider this won’t be his lasting home,” she said. “For us it’s an important place to go.”
In her view, new interments should cease but says it is premature to disturb current plots. “My preference for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a critical moment has been reached.”
Searching for Solutions and Certainty
An absence of consensus over when and how to tackle the problem has left bereaved families feeling exasperated and worried.
Several families want more sea defences to delay the inevitable erosion and to allow burials to proceed for now. Different voices contend the time for relocation is drawing near.
“It is very emotive,” said one relative. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”
A local official confirmed the graveyards were under the care of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is down to them to choose the path to take. We are here to help support them through that journey with communities.”
It was also stated there was ample time to consider all the options. “We are talking many years before it starts to be lost.”
“There is no common view on what should happen yet. It requires good community discussions to discover the right solutions for each village.”
The prospect of the loss of the churches and graveyards was labeled one of “immense sorrow for the area,” but church representatives also spoke of a belief in life after death, providing a theological perspective on the physical disappearance of sacred ground.